Publications - Topic

Language Acquisition

  • Faes, J., Gillis, J., & Gillis, S. (2022). Morphosyntactic development after auditory brainstem implantation in three Dutch-speaking children with profound hearing loss. In R. Levie, A. Bar-On, O. Ashkenazi, E. Dattner, & G. Brandes (Eds.), Developing language and literacy.
  • Faes, J., De Maeyer, S., & Gillis, S. (2021). Speech intelligibility of children with an auditory brainstem implant: a triple-case study. Clinical Linguistics & Phonetics.
  • Faes, J., Gillis, J., & Gillis, S. (2021). Speech production accuracy of children with auditory brainstem implants: A comparison with peers with cochlear implants and typical hearing using Levenshtein distance. First Language. doi:10.1177/01427237211042216
  • Odijk, L., & Gillis, S. (2021). Tailoring the input to children’s needs: the use of fine lexical tuning in speech directed to normally hearing children and children with cochlear implants. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, Article 676664. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2021.676664.
  • Faes, J., & Gillis, S. (2021). Word characteristics and speech production accuracy in children with auditory brainstem implants: A longitudinal triple case report. Clinical Linguistics & Phonetics, 35(9), 874-890. doi:10.1080/02699206.2020.1838613
  • Faes, J., & Gillis, S. (2021). Hersenstamimplantatie bij kinderen: Wat weten we (niet) en wat is het effect ervan in de praktijk? Logopedie (juli-augustus), 52-58.
  • Faes, J., & Gillis, S. (2021). Consonant and vowel production in the spontaneous speech productions of children with auditory brainstem implants. Clinical Linguistics & Phonetics. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/02699206.2020.1869833
  • Vanormelingen, L., Faes, J., & Gillis, S. (2020). Language development in children from different SES backgrounds: Babbling onset and consonant characteristics. Dutch Journal of Applied Linguistics, 9(1-2), 132-161. doi:10.1075/dujal.19032.van
  • Odijk, L., & Gillis, S. (2020). Fine lexical tuning in infant directed speech to typically developing children. Journal of Child Language, 48(3), 591-604. doi:10.1017/S0305000920000379
  • Boonen, N., Kloots, H., & Gillis, S. (2020). Is the spontaneous speech of 7-year-old cochlear implanted children as intelligible as that of their normally hearing peers? International Journal of Pediatric Otorhinolaryngology, 133, 109956. doi:10.1016/j.ijporl.2020.109956
  • Boonen, N., Kloots, H., & Gillis, S. (2020). Rating the overall speech quality of hearing-impaired children by means of comparative judgements. Journal of Communication Disorders, 83, Article 105969. doi:10.1016/j.jcomdis.2019.105969
  • Boonen, N., Kloots, H., & Gillis, S. (2020). Identificeerbaarheid van kinderen met een gehoorbeperking: een vergelijkende benadering. Dutch Journal of Applied Linguistics, 19(1-2), 1-20. doi:https://doi.org/10.1075/dujal.18017.boo
  • Ashkenazi, O., Gillis, S., & Ravid, D. (2020). Input-output relations in Hebrew verb acquisition at the morpho-lexical interface. Journal of Child Language, 47, 509-532. doi: 10.1017/S0305000919000540
  • Boonen, N., Kloots, H., & Gillis, S. (2020). Native and non-native listeners’ judgement on the overall speech quality of hearing-impaired children. Clinical Linguistics & Phonetics, 34(12), 1149-1168. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/02699206.2020.1731605
  • Faes, J., Boonen, N., & Gillis, S. (2019). Hersenstamimplantatie bij kinderen: Wat is het effect op de vroege spraakproductie? Logopedie, 32, 9-19.
  • De Clerck, I., Verhoeven, J., Gillis, S., Pettinato, M., & Gillis, S. (2019). Listeners’ perception of lexical stress in the first words of infants with cochlear implants and normally hearing infants. Journal of Communication Disorders, 80, 52-65. doi: 10.1016/j.jcomdis.2019.03.008
  • Faes, J., & Gillis, S. (2019). Auditory brainstem implantation in children with hearing loss: effect on speech production. International Journal of Pediatric Otorhinolaryngology, 119, 103-112. doi:10.1016/j.ijporl.2019.01.014
  • Grimm, R., Cassani, G., Gillis, S., & Daelemans, W. (2019). Children probably store short rather than frequent or predictable chunks: quantitative evidence from a corpus study. Frontiers in Psychology, 10(80). doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00080
  • Grandon, B., Vilain, A., & Gillis, S. (2019). The effect of hearing impairment on the production of prominences: the case of French-speaking school-aged children using cochlear implants and children with normal hearing. First Language, 39(2), 200-219. doi:10.1177/0142723718819191
  • Faes, J., & Gillis, S. (2019). Expressive vocabulary growth after pediatric auditory brainstem implantation in two cases’ spontaneous productions: a comparison with children with cochlear implants and typical hearing. Frontiers in Pediatrics, 7, Article 191. doi: 10.3389/fped.2019.00191
  • Boonen, N., Kloots, H., Verhoeven, J., & Gillis, S. (2019). Can listeners hear the difference between children with normal hearing and children with a hearing impairment? Clinical Linguistics & Phonetics, 33(4), 316-333. doi:10.1080/02699206.2018.1513564
  • Kloots, H., Gillis, S., & Verhoeven, J. (2018). Over vlugge spraak en vluchtige sjwa's. De relatie tussen spreektempo en de duur van Nederlandse svarabhaktivocalen. Verslagen en Mededelingen van de Koninklijke Academie voor Nederlandse Taal en Letteren, 128(3), 317-349.
  • Boonen, N., Kloots, H., & Gillis, S. (2017). Ervaring met kinderspraak beïnvloedt spraakperceptie van luisteraars. Over Taal, 9-11.
  • Faes, J., & Gillis, S. (2016). Word initial fricative production in children with cochlear implants and their normally hearing peers matched on lexicon size. Clinical Linguistics and Phonetics, 30(12), 959-982.

Acquisition of Dutch

  • Rys, K., Keuleers, E., Daelemans, W., & Gillis, S. (2017). Acquisition of phonological variables of a Flemish dialect by children raised in Standard Dutch: Some considerations on the learning mechanisms. In G. De Vogelaer & M. Katerbow (Eds.), Acquiring sociolinguistic variation (pp. 267-304). Amsterdam: Benjamins.
  • Vanormelingen, L., & Gillis, S. (2016). The influence of socio-economic status on mothers’ volubility and responsiveness in a monolingual Dutch-speaking sample. First Language, 36 (2), 140-156.
  • Gillis, S. (2004). Vroege taalverwerving. In F. Daems & K. Van den Brande & L. Verschaffel (Eds.), Taal verwerven op school. Taaldidactiek voor basisonderwijs en eerste graad secundair (pp. 29-59). Leuven: Acco.
  • Gillis, S., & Schaerlaekens, A. (Eds.). (2000). Kindertaalverwerving: Een handboek voor het Nederlands. Groningen: Martinus Nijhoff.
  • Gillis, S., & De Houwer, A. (Eds.). (1998). The acquisition of Dutch. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: Benjamins.
  • De Houwer, A., & Gillis, S. (1998). Dutch child language: An overview. In S. Gillis & A. De Houwer (Eds.), The acquisition of Dutch (pp. 1-100). Amsterdam/Philadelphia: Benjamins.
  • De Houwer, A., & Gillis, S. (1998). Introduction. In S. Gillis & A. De Houwer (Eds.), The acquisition of Dutch (pp. xiv - xvi). Amsterdam/Philadelphia: Benjamins.
  • De Houwer, A., & Gillis, S. (Eds.). (1993). Kindertaalstudie in de Lage Landen (= Antwerp Papers in Linguistics Vol. 75). Antwerp: University of Antwerp.
  • Gillis, S., & De Houwer, A. (Eds.). (1993). NETWerken (= Antwerp Papers in Linguistics Vol. 74). Antwerp: University of Antwerp.
  • Schaerlaekens, A., & Gillis, S. (1991). De taalverwerving van het kind: Een hernieuwde oriëntatie in het Nederlandstalig onderzoek (2 ed.). Groningen: Wolters-Noordhoff.
  • Schaerlaekens, A., & Gillis, S. (1987). De taalverwerving van het kind: Een hernieuwde oriëntatie in het Nederlandstalig onderzoek. Groningen: Wolters-Noordhoff.
Language acquisition by children with a Cochlear Implant
  • Grimm, R., Pettinato, M., Gillis, S., & Daelemans, W. (2019). Simulating speech processing with cochlear implants: How does channel interaction affect learning in neural networks? PLOS ONE, 14(2). doi:https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0212134
  • Boonen, N., Kloots, H., Verhoeven, J., & Gillis, S. (2018). Can listeners hear the difference between children with normal hearing and children with a hearing impairment? Clinical Linguistics & Phonetics, 33(4), 316-333. doi:10.1080/02699206.2018.1513564
  • Gillis, S. (2018). Speech and language in congenitally deaf children with a cochlear implant. In A. Bar-On & D. Ravid (Eds.), Handbook of Communication Disorders: Theoretical, Empirical, and Applied Linguistic Perspectives (pp. 763-790). Berlin: Mouton De Gruyter.
  • De Clerck, I., Pettinato, M., Gillis, S., Verhoeven, J., & Gillis, S. (2018). Prosodic modulation in the babble of cochlear implanted and normally hearing infants: a perceptual study using a visual analogue scale. First Language, 38(5), 481-502.
  • Faes, J., & Gillis, S. (2018). Intraword variability in children with cochlear implants: the long-term development up to five years of age and a comparison with children with normal hearing. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 27, 706-720.
  • Faes, J., Gillis, J., & Gillis, S. (2018). Le développement de la richesse flexionnelle d'enfants porteurs d'un implant cochléaire et d'enfants normo-entendants. Cahiers de l'ILSL, 56, 79-96.
  • Cassani, G., Grimm, R., Daelemans, W., & Gillis, S. (2018). Lexical category acquisition is facilitated by uncertainty in distributional co-occurrences. PLOS ONE, 13(12), e0209449. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0209449
  • Faes, J., & Gillis, S. (2017). The effect of word frequency on phonemic accuracy in children with cochlear implants and peers with typical levels of hearing. Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education, 22(3), 290-302.
  • Pettinato, M., De Clerck, I., Verhoeven, J., & Gillis, S. (2017). Expansion of prosodic abilities at the transition from babble to words: A comparison between children with cochlear implants and normally hearing children. Ear & Hearing, 38(4), 475-486.
  • Faes, J., & Gillis, S. (2017). Consonant cluster production in children with cochlear implants: A comparison with normally hearing peers. First Language, 37(4), 319-349.
  • Vanormelingen, L., De Maeyer, S., & Gillis, S. (2016). A comparison of maternal and child language in normally hearing and children with cochlear implants. Language, Interaction and Acquisition, 7(2), 145-179.
  • Verhoeven, J., Hide, O., De Maeyer, S., Gillis, S., & Gillis, S. (2016). Hearing impairment and vowel production. A comparison between typically developing, hearing-aided and cochlear implanted Dutch children. Journal of Communication Disorders, 59, 24-39.
  • Faes, J., & Gillis, S. (2016). Taalontwikkeling na vroege cochleaire implantatie: uitkomsten op lange termijn in vergelijking met normaalhorende leeftijdsgenoten. Logopedie, 29, 15-26.
  • Faes, J., Gillis, J., & Gillis, S. (2016). Phonemic accuracy development in children with cochlear implants up to five years of age by using Levenshtein distance. Journal of Communication Disorders, 59, 40-58.
  • Pettinato, M., De Clerck, I., Verhoeven, J., & Gillis, S. (2015). The production of word stress in babbles and early words: a comparison between normally hearing infants and infants with cochlear implants. In The Scottish Consortium for ICPhS 2015 (Ed.), Proceedings of the 18th International Congress of Phonetic Sciences. Glasgow: The University of Glasgow. (http://www.icphs2015.info/pdfs/Papers/ICPHS0994.pdf)
  • Vanormelingen, L., De Maeyer, S., & Gillis, S. (2015). Interaction patterns of mothers of children with different degrees of hearing: normally hearing children and congenitally hearing-impaired children with a cochlear implant. International Journal of Pediatric Otorhinolaryngology, 79, 520-526.
  • Faes, J., Gillis, J., & Gillis, S. (2015). Syntagmatic and paradigmatic development of cochlear implanted children in comparison with normally hearing peers up to age 7. International Journal of Pediatric Otorhinolaryngology, 79, 1533-1540.
  • Vanormelingen, L., Kloots, H., & Gillis, S. (2013). Reageren ouders van normaalhorende kideren anders dan ouders van dove kinderen met een cochleair implantaat? Logopedie, 26, 27-36.
  • Tribushinina, E., Gillis, S., & De Maeyer, S. (2013). Infrequent word classes in the speech of two- to seven-year-old children with cochlear implants and their normally hearing peers: A longitudinal study of adjective use. International Journal of Pediatric Otorhinolaryngology, 77, 356-361.
  • Gillis, S. (2013). Klinkt de spraak van een kind met een cochleair implantaat zoals de spraak van een normaal horend kind? Logopedie, 26, 15-24.
  • Coene, M., Schauwers, K., Gillis, S., Rooryck, J., & Govaerts, P. (2011). Genetic predisposition and sensory experience in language development: Evidence from cochlear-implanted children. Language and Cognitive Processes, 26(8), 1083-1101.
  • Schauwers, K., Gillis, S., & Govaerts, P. (2008). The characteristics of prelexical babbling after cochlear implantation between 5 and 20 months of age. Ear and Hearing, 29, 627-637.

  • Schauwers, K., Taelman, H., Gillis, S., & Govaerts, P. (2008). Phonological proficiency and accuracy of young hearing-impaired children with a cochlear implant. In S. Kern, F. Gayraud & E. Marsico (Eds.), Emergence of linguistic abilities (pp. 156-171). Newcastle: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.
  • Schauwers, K., Govaerts, P., & Gillis, S. (2008). Co-occurrence patterns in the babbling of children with a cochlear implant. In B. Davis & K. Zajdo (Eds.), The syllable in speech production: Perspectives on the Frame Content Theory. (pp. 187-204) New York: Taylor and Francis.
  • Schauwers, K., Gillis, S., & Govaerts, P. (2007). Brabbelen bij dove kinderen na cochleaire implantatie: Onderzoek naar de segmentele en syllabische kenmerken. Logopedie, 20, 37-48.

  • Hide, O., Gillis, S., & Govaerts, P. (2007). Suprasegmental aspects of pre-lexical speech in cochlear implanted children In Proceedings of Interspeech 2007: Eighth Annual Conference of the International Speech Communication Association (pp. 638-641). Antwerp: ISSN 1990-9772.
  • Schauwers, K., Govaerts, P., & Gillis, S. (2005). Language acquisition in deaf children with a cochlear implant. In P. Fletcher & J. Miller (Eds.), Developmental theory and language disorders (pp. 95-119). Amsterdam: Benjamins.
  • Govaerts, P., Daemers, K., Schauwers, K., De Beukelaer, C., Yperman, M., De Ceulaer, G., & Gillis, S. (2004). Implantation précoce et/ou bilatrale. Rééducation Orthophonique, 42, 31-46.
  • Schauwers, K., Gillis, S., & Govaerts, P. (2004). Babbling in early implanted CI children. In R. Miyamoto (Ed.), Cochlear Implants (pp. 344-347). Amsterdam: Elsevier.
  • Schauwers, K., Gillis, S., Daemers, K., De Beukelaer, C., & Govaerts, P. (2004). The onset of babbling and the audiological outcome in cochlear implantation between 5 and 20 months of age. Otology and Neurotology, 25, 263-270.
  • Schauwers, K., Gillis, S., Daemers, K., De Beukelaer, C., De Ceulaer, G., Yperman, M., & Govaerts, P. (2004). Normal hearing and language development in a deaf-born child. Otology and Neurotology, 25, 924-929.
  • Schauwers, K., Gillis, S., De Beukelaer, C., Daelemans, W., Offeciers, F., & Govaerts, P. (2003). Cochleaire implantatie tussen 5 en 20 maanden: De onset van brabbelen en de audiologische outcome. Logopedie, 16, 113-123.
  • Gillis, S., Schauwers, K., & Govaerts, P. (2002). Babbling milestones and beyond: Early speech development in CI children. In K. Schauwers & P. Govaerts & S. Gillis (Eds.), Language acquisition in very young children with a cochlear implant (pp. 23-40). Antwerp: University of Antwerp.
  • Schauwers, K., Govaerts, P., & Gillis, S. (2002). Language acquisition in children with a cochlear implant (= Antwerp Papers in Linguistics Vol. 102). Antwerp: University of Antwerp.
  • Govaerts, P., Schauwers, K., & Gillis, S. (2002). Language acquisition in very young children with a cochlear implant: introduction. In K. Schauwers & P. Govaerts & S. Gillis (Eds.), Language acquisition in very young children with a cochlear implant (pp. 1-10). Antwerp: University of Antwerp.
Phonology (& Phonetics)
  • De Clerck, I., Pettinato, M., Verhoeven, J., & Gillis, S. (2017). Is prosodic production driven by lexical development? Longitudinal evidence from babble and words. Journal of Child Language, 44, 1248-1273.
  • van den Berg, R., Van Severen, L., Molemans, I., & Gillis, S. (2017). Syllable type development in toddlers acquiring Dutch. Dutch Journal of Applied Linguistics, 6(1), 119-146.
Truncation in early phonological development
  • Taelman, H., & Gillis, S. (In press). Do Dutch-speaking children prefer to produce trochees? A reevaluation of the trochaic template hypothesis of Dutch truncations. First Language.
  • Taelman, H., & Gillis, S. (2008). Is epenthesis a means to optimize feet? A reanalysis of the CLPF database. Journal of Child Language, 35, 439-452.
  • Taelman, H., Martens, E., & Gillis, S. (2005). De fonologische deletiehypothese: Sommige kinderen snoeien hun infinitieven graag tot stammen. Nederlandse Taalkunde, 10, 30-58.
  • Taelman, H., & Gillis, S. (2003). Hebben Nederlandstalige kinderen een voorkeur voor trochaïsche productievormen? Een onderzoek naar truncaties in vroege kindertaal. Nederlandse Taalkunde, 8, 130-157.
  • Taelman, H., & Gillis, S. (2002). Variation and consistency in children's truncation patterns. In J. Costa & M. J. Freitas (Eds.), Proceedings of the GALA 2001 Conference on Language Acquisition (pp. 263-270). Lisbon: Associacào Portuguesa de Linguistica.
  • Taelman, H., & Gillis, S. (2001). Variation in children's early production of multisyllabic words: The case of truncations. In S. Kern (Ed.), Early lexicon acquisition: Normal and pathological development (CD ROM). Lyon: Université Lumière Lyon 2.
  • Taelman, H., & Gillis, S. (2000). Gebruiken kinderen abstracte prosodische representaties? Een analyse van truncaties in het Maarten-corpus (= Antwerp Papers in Linguistics Vol. 99). Antwerp: University of Antwerp.
Intuitive syllabification
  • Gillis, S., & Sandra, D. (2001). Phonology and morphology in children's intuitive syllabifications. In M. Almgren & A. Barreña & M. Ezeizabarrena & I. Idiazabal & B. MacWhinney (Eds.), Research on Child Language Acquisition: Proceedings of the 8th Conference of the International Association for the Study of Child Language (pp. 827-839). Somerville: Cascadilla Press.
  • Gillis, S., & Sandra, D. (2000). The influence of spelling rules on phonology. In M. Beers & B. van den Bogaerde & G. Bol & J. de Jong & C. Rooijmans (Eds.), From sound to sentence: Studies on first language acquisition (pp. 43-55). Groningen: CLCG.
  • Verhoeven, J., & Gillis, S. (2000). Duurkenmerken van intervocalische occlusieven in het Nederlands. In S. Gillis & J. Nuyts & J. Taeldeman (Eds.), Met taal om de tuin geleid (pp. 461-473). Antwerp: University of Antwerp.
  • Sandra, D., Gillis, S., & De Schutter, G. (1999). The interaction of phonological and morphological knowledge in children's intuitive syllabifications. In M. Beers & S. Peters (Eds.), Phonological development: Different perspectives (pp. 17-31). Antwerp: University of Antwerp.
  • Gillis, S., & Sandra, D. (1999). Children's and adults' syllabification: The influence of spelling. In A. Aksu-Koç & E. Erguvanli-Taylan & A. Sumru Özsoy & A. Kuntay (Eds.), Perspectives on language acquisition (pp. 336-354). Istanbul: Bogazici University Press.
  • Sandra, D., & Gillis, S. (1998). The effect of phonological, morphological and orthographic knowledge on children’s intuitive syllabification: A longitudinal approach, Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Spoken Language Processing (CD ROM). Sidney.
  • Sandra, D., Gillis, S., & De Schutter, G. (1997). Het effect van morfeemgrenzen op de intuïtieve syllabisering van kleuters en gealfabetiseerde kinderen. Gramma/TTT, 6(3), 243-253.
  • Gillis, S., & De Schutter, G. (1996). Intuitive syllabification: Universals and language specific constraints. Journal of Child Language, 23, 487-514.
  • Gillis, S., Verhoeven, J., & De Schutter, G. (1995). Neutralization of consonant length: The case of Dutch intervocalic stops. Proceedings of EUROSPEECH '95 : 4th European Conference on Speech Communication and Technology, 2259-2262.
  • Verhoeven, J., Gillis, S., & De Schutter, G. (1995). Syllabification of intervocalic consonants in Dutch: Single consonants or geminates?, Proceedings of the XIIIth International Congress of Phonetic Sciences (Vol. 3, pp. 548-551). Stockholm.
  • Gillis, S. (1995). Fonetische cues voor een fonotactische restrictie? In L. Elbers & S. van der Meulen & L. Schlichting (Eds.), 7de Symposium van het Netwerk Eerste Taalverwerving (pp. 44-46). Utrecht.
  • De Schutter, G., & Gillis, S. (1994). Intuïtieve syllabisering in de taalverwerving: Een vergelijking van vijf- en achtjarigen (= Antwerp Papers in Linguistics Vol. 80). Antwerp: University of Antwerp.
General
Syntax
  • Taelman, H., & Gillis, S. (In press). The impact of lexical-statistical learning on Dutch children’s use of fillers and articles. First Language.
  • Wijnen, F., Kempen, M., & Gillis, S. (2001). Bare infinitives in Dutch early child language: An effect of input? Journal of Child Language, 28, 629-660.
  • Blom, E., Wijnen, F., Kempen, M., & Gillis, S. (2000). Vorm verandert, betekenis blijft: Modale zinnen in Nederlandse kindertaal. In S. Gillis & J. Nuyts & J. Taeldeman (Eds.), Met taal om de tuin geleid (pp. 25-35). Antwerp: University of Antwerp.
  • Blom, E., Kempen, M., Gillis, S., & Wijnen, F. (2000). What they hear is what you get? Infinitives and modality in child language and child-directed speech. In M. Perkins & S. Howard (Eds.), New directions in language development and disorders (pp. 199-209). New York: Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers.
  • Blom, E., Wijnen, F., & Gillis, S. (1999). Modal infinitives in the speech of Dutch mothers and their children. In J. van der Auwera & F. Durieux & L. Lejeune (Eds.), English as a human language (pp. 12-21). München: LINCOM.
  • Kempen, M., Blom, E., Gillis, S., & Wijnen, F. (1999). Do Dutch children learn root infinitives from their mothers? In J. Verschueren (Ed.), Pragmatics in 1998: Selected papers from the 6th International Pragmatics Conference (Vol. 2, pp. 310-320). Antwerp: International Pragmatics Association.
  • Kempen, M., Gillis, S., & Wijnen, F. (1997). Dutch children and their mothers' infinitives. In A. Sorace & A. Heycock & R. Shillcock (Eds.), Language acquisition: Knowledge representation and processing (pp. 85-89). Edinburgh: HCRC.
  • Gillis, S., & Verhoeven, J. (1992). Developmental aspects of syntactic complexity in two triplets (= Antwerp Papers in Linguistics Vol. 70). Antwerp: University of Antwerp.
Lexicon and reference
  • Gillis, S., & De Schutter, G. (1988). De lange weg naar het eerste woordgebruik. Psychologica Belgica, 28, 105-121.
  • Gillis, S. (1987). Woorden en betekenissen in de vroege taalverwerving. Deel 1. Audiopedagogica, 3, 2-13.
  • Gillis, S. (1987). Woorden en betekenissen in de vroege taalverwerving. Deel 2. Audiopedagogica, 3, 2-13.
  • Gillis, S. (1987). Words and categories at the onset of language acquisition. Belgian Journal of Linguistics, 2, 37-53.
  • Gillis, S., & De Schutter, G. (1986). Transitional phenomena revisited: Insights into the nominal insight. In B. Lindblom & R. Zetterström (Eds.), Precursors of early speech. (pp. 127-142). New York: Stockton Press.
  • Gillis, S., & De Schutter, G. (1986). Le long cheminement vers le premier emploi des mots. Lingvisticae Investigationes, 10, 67-83.
  • Gillis, S. (1986). This child's Nominal Insight is actually a process: The plateau stage and the vocabulary spurt in early lexical development (= Antwerp Papers in Linguistics Vol. 45). Antwerp: University of Antwerp.
  • Gillis, S. (1986). De ontwikkeling van het intentioneel communicatief vocaliseren: Cognitieve en sociaal-interactionele aspecten (= Antwerp Papers in Linguistics Vol. 42). Antwerp: University of Antwerp.
  • Gillis, S. (1985). Protowoorden in de taalverwerving. Onze Taal, 54, 112-113.
  • Gillis, S. (1985). The development of the concept of reference in its interactional context. Studia Filologiczne, 21, 73-89.
  • Gillis, S. (1985). De ontwikkeling van het intentioneel communicatief handelen. TTT, 5, 299-335.
  • De Houwer, A., & Gillis, S. (1985). Language and communication during the second year of life. Journal of Pragmatics, 9, 683-704.
  • Gillis, S., & Schaerlaekens, A. (Eds.). (1985). Pragmatic aspects of early lexical acquisition and development. Journal of Pragmatics, Theme Issue.
  • Gillis, S., & Schaerlaekens, A. (1985). Introduction: Pragmatic aspects of early lexical acquisition and development. Journal of Pragmatics, 9, 427-432.
  • Gillis, S. (1985). Towards the first word. In M. Spoelders & F. Van Besien & F. Lowenthal & F. Van Damme (Eds.), Language acquisition and learning: Essays in developmental pragmatics (pp. 41-49). Leuven: ACCO.
  • Gillis, S. (1985). Een voorloper van linguïstische referentie. In K. Van den Eynde & M. Dominicy & P. Verluyten (Eds.), Linguistics in Belgium 6 (pp. 57-71). Antwerp: University of Antwerp.
  • Gillis, S. (1984). De verwerving van talige referentie. Unpublished PhD, University of Antwerp, Antwerp.
  • Gillis, S. (1983). Interactie zonder woorden: De ontogenese van de communicatieve intentie. In F. Daems & L. Goossens (Eds.), Een spyeghel voor G. Jo Steenbergen. (pp. 137-146). Leuven: ACCO.
  • Gillis, S. (1983). Van pretalige naar talige interactie: Semantische en pragmatische aspecten van de éénwoordfase in de taalverwerving (= Antwerp Papers in Linguistics Vol. 30). Antwerp: University of Antwerp.
  • Gillis, S. (1982). De verwerving van een woordveld bij 4;5 tot 6-jarigen: Een verkennend onderzoek. (Vol. 28). Antwerp: University of Antwerp.
  • Gillis, S. (1982). On prelinguistic prerequisites for linguistic reference. In S. Daalder & M. Gerritsen (Eds.), Linguistics in the Netherlands 1982. (pp. 157-165). Amsterdam: North-Holland.
Corpora
  • Gillis, S. (2004). Gillis Corpus TalkBank.
  • Gillis, S. (2000). Overzicht van Nederlandstalige corpora in het CHILDES-archief. In S. Gillis & A. Schaerlaekens (Eds.), Kindertaalverwerving: Een handboek voor het Nederlands (pp. 473-474). Groningen: Martinus Nijhoff.
  • Gillis, S., & Schaerlaekens, A. (1994). Corpus Dutch Triplets. In B. MacWhinney (Ed.), The CHILDES database CD-ROM. Dublin (OH): Discovery Systems.
  • Gillis, S. (1991). Corpus Dutch. In B. MacWhinney (Ed.), The CHILDES database CD-ROM. Dublin (OH): Discovery Systems.
Methodology
  • Gillis, S. (2016). L' usage des corpus oraux pour la recherche sur l' acquisition. Cahiers de l'ILSL, 45, 95-122.
  • Molemans, I., van den Berg, R., Van Severen, L., & Gillis, S. (2012). How to measure the onset of babbling reliably? Journal of Child Language, 39, 523-552.
  • Van Severen, L., Molemans, I., van den Berg, R., & Gillis, S. (2012). Consonant inventories in the spontaneous speech of young children: A bootstrapping procedure. Clinical Linguistics and Phonetics, 26(2), 164-187.
  • Van Severen, L., van den Berg, R., Molemans, I., Govaerts, P., & Gillis, S. (2010). Betrouwbaarheid van spontane kindertaalanalyses: Consonantinventarissen. Toegepaste Taalkunde in Artikelen, 83, 67-77.
  • Xanthos, A., & Gillis, S. (2010). Quantifying the development of inflectional diversity. First Language, 30, 175-198.
  • Gillis, S., & De Houwer, A. (2000). Methodologie van de kindertaalstudie. In S. Gillis & A. Schaerlaekens (Eds.), Kindertaalverwerving: Een handboek voor het Nederlands (pp. 39-91). Groningen: Martinus Nijhoff.
  • MacWhinney, B., & Gillis, S. (1998). Child and adult spoken language resources: The CHILDES system. In A. Rubio & N. Gallardo & R. Castro & A. Tejada (Eds.), Proceedings of the First International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation (pp. 1367-1371). Granada: ELRA.
  • Gillis, S. (1998). CHILDES: Een instrumentarium voor taal- en spraakanalyse. Logopedie, 11, 11-21.
  • Gillis, S. (1996). Transcript analysis using CHAT and CLAN. In J. Caron-Pargue & S. Gillis (Eds.), Verbal production and problem solving (Vol. 85, pp. 91-104). Antwerp: University of Antwerp.
  • Gillis, S. (1991). Dutch UNIBET. In B. MacWhinney (Ed.), The CHILDES project: Tools for analyzing talk. Hillsdale: Erlbaum.
General
  • Tribushinina, E., & Gillis, S. (2017). Advances and lacunas in usage-based studies of first language acquisition. In J. Evers-Vermeul, L. Rasier, & E. Tribushinina (Eds.), Usage-Based Approaches to Language Acquisition and Language Teaching. (pp. 13-46) Berlin: Mouton De Gruyter.
  • Laaha, S., Blineder, M., & Gillis, S. (2015). Noun plural production in preschoolers with early cochlear implantation: an experimental study of Dutch and German. International Journal of Pediatric Otorhinolaryngology, 79, 561-569.
  • Gillis, S. (2014). Child Language Data Exchange System. In P. Brooks & V. Kempe (Eds.), Encyclopedia of Language Development (pp. 74-78). Los Angeles: Sage.
  • Van Severen, L., Gillis, J., Molemans, I., van den Bergh, R., De Maeyer, S., & Gillis, S. (2013). The relation between order of acquisition, segmental frequency and function: the case of word-initial consonants in Dutch. Journal of Child Language, 40(4), 703-740.
  • Molemans, I., Van Severen, L., van den Berg, R., Govaerts, P., & Gillis, S. (2010). Spraakzaamheid van Nederlandstalige baby's en peuters: Longitudinale spontane spraakdata. Logopedie, 23, 12-23.
  • Taelman, H., Durieux, G., & Gillis, S. (2009). Fillers as signs of distributional learning. Journal of Child Language, 36, 323-353.

  • Gillis, S., & Ravid, D. (2009). Language acquisition. In D. Sandra, J. O. Östman & J. Verschueren (Eds.), Cognition and pragmatics (pp. 201-249). Amsterdam: Benjamins.

  • Taelman, H., Durieux, G., & Gillis, S. (2005). Notes on Ingram's whole-word measures for phonological development. Journal of Child Language, 32, 391-405.
  • Gillis, S., & Ravid, D. (2002). Language acquisition. In J. O. Östman & J. Verschueren & J. Blommaert & C. Bulcaen (Eds.), Handbook of pragmatics (pp. 1-58). Amsterdam: Benjamins.
  • Gillis, S. (2000). Fonemen en syllabes van het Nederlands. In S. Gillis & A. Schaerlaekens (Eds.), Kindertaalverwerving: Een handboek voor het Nederlands (pp. 475-487). Groningen: Martinus Nijhoff.
  • Gillis, S. (2000). Fonologische ontwikkeling. In S. Gillis & A. Schaerlaekens (Eds.), Kindertaalverwerving: Een handboek voor het Nederlands (pp. 131-184). Groningen: Martinus Nijhoff.
  • Gillis, S. (1995). Aspecten van de perceptuele ontwikkeling in het eerste levensjaar. Logopedie, 8, 31-46.
  • Gillis, S. (1995). Recente ontwikkelingen in het taalverwervingsonderzoek, XVIIde congres van de Vlaamse Vereniging voor Logopedisten (pp. 1 - 21). Antwerpen.
  • Gillis, S. (1993). Fonologische ontwikkeling: De perceptuele en produktieve basis, 19de Studiedag van de Belgische Vereniging voor Audiofonologie (pp. 1-36). Brussel.
  • Gillis, S. (1992). Topics in 'natural' natural language acquisition. In W. Daelemans & D. Powers (Eds.), Background and experiments in machine learning of natural language (pp. 25-52). Tilburg: ITK Proceedings.
  • Gillis, S., Koopmans-van Beinum, F., & Van der Stelt, J. (1988). De prelinguale periode (= Antwerp Papers in Linguistics Vol. 55). Antwerp: University of Antwerp.
  • Gillis, S., & De Schutter, G. (1988). Taalverwerving als een transactioneel proces. Pedagogisch Tijdschrift, 13, 250-262.
  • Gillis, S., Koopmans-van Beinum, F., & Van der Stelt, J. (1988). The prelinguistic stage. In P. Jordens & J. Lalleman (Eds.), Language development (pp. 29-56). Dordrecht: Foris.
  • De Houwer, A., & Gillis, S. (1987). Introduction: Perspectives on child language. Belgian Journal of Linguistics, 2, 7-9.
  • Gillis, S. (1987). Een schets van recente ontwikkelingen in het onderzoek van de taalverwerving. Handelingen der Koninklijke Zuidnederlandse Maatschappij voor Taal- en Letterkunde en Geschiedenis, XLI, 93-116.
  • De Houwer, A., & Gillis, S. (Eds.). (1987). Perspectives on child language. Belgian Journal of Linguistics. Theme Issue.

Morphology

  • Ashkenazi, O., Ravid, D., & Gillis, S. (2016). Breaking into the Hebrew verb system: A learning problem. First Language, 36(5), 505-524.
  • Ravid, D., Ashkenazi, O., Levie, R., Ben Zadok, G., Grunwald, T., Bratslavsky, R., & Gillis, S. (2016). Foundations of the early root category: Analyses of linguistic input to Hebrew-speaking children. In R. Berman (Ed.), Acquisition and Development of Hebrew: Infancy to Adolescence (pp. 95-134). Amsterdam: Benjamins.
  • Gillis, S., & Ravid, D. (2006). Typological effects on spelling development: A crosslinguistic study of Hebrew and Dutch. Journal of Child Language, 33, 621-659.
  • Gillis, S., & Ravid, D. (2003). Fonologie, morfologie en leren spellen: Een crosslinguïstisch psycholinguïstisch onderzoek. In G. De Schutter & S. Gillis (Eds.), Fonologische kruispunten (pp. 199-231). Gent: KANTL.
  • Ravid, D., & Gillis, S. (2002). Teachers' perception of spelling patterns and children's spelling errors: A cross-linguistic perspective. In M. Neef & A. Neijt & R. Sproat (Eds.), Consistency in writing systems (pp. 71-93). Tübingen: Niemeyer Verlag.
  • Gillis, S., & Ravid, D. (2001). Typological differentiation in the development of orthographic systems: Evidence from Hebrew and Dutch. In I. Barrière & G. Morgan & S. Chiat & B. Woll (Eds.), Current research in language and communicatin science. Volume 1. (pp. 183-190). London: City University London.
  • Gillis, S., & Ravid, D. (2001). Language-specific effects on the development of written morphology. In S. Bendjaballah, W. U. Dressler, O. Pfeiffer & M. Voeikova (Eds.), Morphology 2000 (pp. 129-136). Amsterdam: Benjamins.
  • Sandra, D., Frisson, S., Durieux, G., Daelemans, W., & Gillis, S. (2000). Hij drinkt niet altijd 't' en ik drink er soms wel: Bronnen van hardnekkige werkwoordfouten in het Nederlands. In S. Gillis & J. Nuyts & J. Taeldeman (Eds.), Met taal om de tuin geleid (pp. 281-296). Antwerp: University of Antwerp.
  • Gillis, S., & Ravid, D. (1999). Effects of phonology and morphology in children's orthographic systems: A crosslinguistic study of Hebrew and Dutch. In E. V. Clark (Ed.), Proceedings of the thirthieth Annual Child Language Research Forum (Vol. 30, pp. 203-210). Stanford: CSLI Publications.

Diminutives

  • Souman, A., & Gillis, S. (2007). A longitudinal study of the acquisition of diminutives in Dutch. In I. SavickienÄ— & W. U. Dressler (Eds.), The Acquisition of Diminutives (pp. 183–206). Amsterdam: Benjamins.
  • Kempe, V., Brooks, P., & Gillis, S. (2007). Diminutives provide multiple benefits for language acquisition. In I. SavickienÄ— & W. U. Dressler (Eds.), The Acquisition of Diminutives (pp. 319-342). Amsterdam: Benjamins.
  • Kempe, V., Brooks, P., Gillis, S., & Samson, G. (2007). Diminutives facilitate word segmentation in natural speech: Cross-linguistic evidence. Memory and Cognition, 35, 762-773.
  • Kempe, V., Brooks, P., & Gillis, S. (2005). Diminutives in child-directed speech supplement metric with distributional word segmentation cues. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 12, 145-151.
  • Gillis, S. (Ed.). (1998). Studies in the acquisition of number and diminutive marking (= Antwerp Papers in Linguistics Vol. 95). Antwerp: University of Antwerp.
  • Gillis, S. (1997). The acquisition of diminutives in Dutch. In W. Dressler (Ed.), Studies in pre- and protomorphology (pp. 165-179). Vienna: Verlag der Österreichischen Akademie der Wissenschaften.
Nouns and verbs
  • Ozcan, F. H., Altinkamis, F. N., & Gillis, S. (2016). Early lexical composition of Turkish-Dutch bilinguals: Nouns before verbs or verbs before nouns. Poznan Studies in Contemporary Linguistics, 52(4), 583-604.
  • Altinkamis, F. N., Ozcan, F. H., & Gillis, S. (2015). A perspective into noun-before-verb bias: Evidence from Turkish-Dutch speaking bilingual children. In E. Babatsouli & D. Ingram (Eds.), Proceedings of the International Symposium on Monolingual and Bilingual Speech 2015 (pp. 8-19). Chania: Institute of Monolingual and Bilingual Speech http://ismbs.eu/publications
  • Tribushinina, E., van den Bergh, H., Ravid, D., Aksu Koç, A., Kilani-Schoch, M., Korecky-Kröll, K., Leibovitch-Cohen, I., Laaha, S., Nir, B., Dressler, W.U., Gillis, S. (2014). Development of adjective frequencies across semantic classes: A growth curve analysis of child speech and parental input. Language, Interaction, and Acquisition, 5(2), 185-226.
  • Tribushinina, E., & Gillis, S. (2012). The acquisition of scalar structures: Production of adjectives and degree markers by Dutch-speaking children and their caregivers. Linguistics, 50(2), 241-268.
  • Xanthos, A., Laaha, S., Gillis, S., Stephany, U., Aksu-Koc, A., Christofidou, A., Gagarina, N., Hrzica, G., Ketrez, N., Kilani-Schoch, M., Korecky-Kröll, K., Kovacevic, M., Laalo, K., Palmovic, M., Pfeiler, B., Voeikova, M., Dressler, W. U. (2011). On the role of morphological richness in the early development of noun and verb inflection. First Language, 31(4), 461-479.
  • Laaha, S., Gillis, S., Kilani-Schoch, M., Korecky-Kröll, K., Xanthos, A., & Dressler, W. U. (2007). Weakly inflecting languages: French, Dutch, German. In S. Laaha & S. Gillis (Eds.), Typological perspectives on the acquisition of noun and verb morphology. [= Antwerp Papers In Linguistics, Vol. 112] (pp. 21-34). Antwerp: University of Antwerp.
  • Gillis, S. (2003). A case study of the early acquisition of verbs in Dutch. In D. Bittner & W. U. Dressler & M. Kilani-Schoch (Eds.), Development of verb inflection in first language acquisition: A cross-linguistic perspective (pp. 171-203). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
  • Gillis, S., & Verlinden, A. (1988). Nouns and verbs in early lexical development (= Antwerp Papers in Linguistics Vol. 54). Antwerp: University of Antwerp.
  • Verlinden, A., & Gillis, S. (1988). Nouns and verbs in the input: Gentner (1982) reconsidered. ABLA Papers, 12, 163-187.
Noun Plurals
  • Abugov, N., & Gillis, S. (2016). Nominal plurals in Antwerp Hasidic Yiddish: An empirical study. Linguistics, 54(6), 1397-1415.
  • Ravid, D., Dressler, W. U., Nir-Sagiv, B., Korecky-Kröll, K., Souman, A., Rehfelt, K., Laaha, S., Bertl, J., Basboll, H. & Gillis, S. (2008). Core morphology in child directed speech: Crosslinguistic corpus analyses of noun plurals. In H. Behrens (Ed.), Corpora in Language Acquisition Research (pp. 25-60). Amsterdam: Benjamins.
  • Laaha, S., & Gillis, S. (Eds.). (2007). Typological perspectives on the acquisition of noun and verb morphology. [= Antwerp Papers In Linguistics, Vol. 112]. Antwerp: University of Antwerp.
  • Keuleers, E., Sandra, D., Daelemans, W., Gillis, S., Durieux, G., & Martens, E. (2007). Dutch plural inflection: The exception that proves the analogy. Cognitive Psychology, 54, 283-318.

Computational Psycholinguistics (& Machine Learning)

  • Grimm, R., Cassani, G., Gillis, S., & Daelemans, W. (2017). Evidence for a facilitatory effect of multi-word units on child word learning. In G. Gunzelmann, A. Howes, T. Tenbrink, & E. Davelaar (Eds.), Proceedings of the 39th Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 433-438). Austin: Cognitive Science Society.
  • Cassani, G., Grimm, R., Gillis, S., & Daelemans, W. (2017). Distributional learning and lexical category acquisition: What makes words easy to categorize? In G. Gunzelmann, A. Howes, T. Tenbrink, & E. Davelaar (Eds.), Proceedings of the 39th Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 216-221). Austin: Cognitive Science Society.
  • Grimm, R., Cassani, G., Gillis, S., & Daelemans, W. (2017). Facilitatory Effects of Multi-Word Units in Lexical Processing and Word Learning: A Computational Investigation. Frontiers in Psychology, 8, Article 555.
  • Cassani, G., Grimm, R., Gillis, S., & Daelemans, W. (2016). Constraining the search space in cross-situational word learning: Different models make different predictions. In A. Papafragou, D. Grodner, D. Mirman, & J. C. Trueswell (Eds.), Proceedings of the 38th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 1152-1157). Austin, TX: Cognitive Science Society.
  • Grimm, R., Cassani, G., Daelemans, W., & Gillis, S. (2015). Towards a model of prediction-based syntactic category acquisition : first steps with word embeddings. In R. Berwick, A. Korhonen, A. Lenci, T. Poibeau, & A. Villavicencio (Eds.), Proceedings of the Sixth Workshop on Cognitive Aspects of Computational Language Learning (pp. 28-32). Lisbon: Association for Computational Linguistics.
  • Cassani, G., Grimm, R., Daelemans, W., & Gillis, S. (2015). Which distributional cues help the most? Unsupervised context selection for lexical category acquisition. In R. Berwick, A. Korhonen, A. Lenci, T. Poibeau, & A. Villavicencio (Eds.), Proceedings of the Sixth Workshop on Cognitive Aspects of Computational Language Learning (pp. 33-39). Lisbon: Association for Computational Linguistics.
  • Rys, K., Daelemans, W., De Pauw, G., & Gillis, S. (2012). Leermechanismen in tweededialectverwerving. Tabu, 40, 59-88.
  • Gillis, S., Daelemans, W., & De Smedt, K. (2009). Artificial intelligence. In D. Sandra, J. O. Östman & J. Verschueren (Eds.), Cognition and pragmatics (pp. 16-40). Amsterdam: Benjamins.
  • Martens, E., Daelemans, W., Gillis, S., & Taelman, H. (2002). Where do syllables come from? In W. Gray & C. Schunn (Eds.), Proceedings of the Twenty-Fourth Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 637-642). Fairfax, Virginia: George Mason University.
  • Durieux, G., & Gillis, S. (2001). Predicting grammatical classes from phonological cues: An empirical test. In B. Höhle & J. Weissenborn (Eds.), Approaches to bootstrapping: phonological, syntactic and neurophysiological aspects of early language acquisition (pp. 189-232). Amsterdam: Benjamins.
  • Gillis, S., Daelemans, W., & Durieux, G. (2000). 'Lazy Learning': Natural and machine learning of word stress. In P. Broeder & J. Murre (Eds.), Models of language acquisition: Inductive and deductive approaches (pp. 76-99). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Daelemans, W., De Pauw, G., Durieux, G., Gillis, S., Hoste, V., & Tjong Kim Sang, E. (2000). Zelflerende systemen als instrument voor de taalkunde en de taaltechnologie. In S. Gillis & J. Nuyts & J. Taeldeman (Eds.), Met taal om de tuin geleid (pp. 81-93). Antwerp: University of Antwerp.
  • Durieux, G., & Gillis, S. (1999). Predicting grammatical categories. In J. van der Auwera & F. Durieux & L. Lejeune (Eds.), English as a human language (pp. 175-187). München: LINCOM.
  • Durieux, G., Daelemans, W., & Gillis, S. (1999). On the arbitrariness of lexical categories. In F. Van Eynde & I. Schuurman & N. Schelkens (Eds.), Computational linguistics in the Netherlands 1998 (pp. 19-35). Amsterdam: Rodopi.
  • Daelemans, W., Berck, P., & Gillis, S. (1997). Data mining as a method for linguistic analysis: Dutch diminutives. Folia Linguistica, 31, 57-75.
  • Daelemans, W., Durieux, G., & Gillis, S. (1997). Skousen's analogical modeling algorithm: A comparison with Lazy Learning. In D. Jones (Ed.), New methods in language processing (pp. 3-15). London: University College Press.
  • Gillis, S., & Durieux, G. (1997). Learning grammatical classes from phonological cues. In A. Sorace & A. Heycock & R. Shillcock (Eds.), Language acquisition: Knowledge representation and processing (pp. 223-228). Edinburgh: HCRC.
  • Daelemans, W., Berck, P., & Gillis, S. (1996). Memory-based part of speech tagging. In G. Durieux & W. Daelemans & S. Gillis (Eds.), CLIN VI: Papers from the Sixth CLIN Meeting (pp. 41-61). Antwerpen: Center for Dutch Language and Speech.
  • Daelemans, W., Berck, P., & Gillis, S. (1996). Unsupervised discovery of phonological categories through supervised learning of morphological rules, 16th International Conference on Computational Linguistics (COLING-96) (pp. 95-100). Copenhagen.
  • Daelemans, W., Zavrel, J., Berck, P., & Gillis, S. (1996). MBT: A memory-based part of speech tagger-generator. In E. Ejerhed & I. Dagan (Eds.), Fourth Workshop on Very Large Corpora (pp. 14-27). Copenhagen.
  • Durieux, G., Daelemans, W., & Gillis, S. (Eds.). (1996). CLIN VI: Papers from the sixth CLIN meeting. Antwerp: Center for Dutch Language and Speech.
  • Gillis, S., & Durieux, G. (1996). Data-driven approaches to phonological acquisition: An empirical test. In B. Bernhardt & J. Gilbert & D. Ingram (Eds.), Proceedings of the UBC International Conference on Phonological Acquisition (pp. 277-292). Somerville: Cascadilla Press.
  • Gillis, S., Durieux, G., & Daelemans, W. (1996). How to set parameters: Analysis of a learning theory. In C. Koster & F. Wijnen (Eds.), Proceedings of the Groningen Assembly on Language Acquisition (pp. 217-226). Groningen: Center for Language and Cognition.
  • Gillis, S., Durieux, G., & Daelemans, W. (1995). A computational model of P&P: Dresher & Kaye (1990) revisited. Amsterdam Series in Child Language Development, 5, 135-173.
  • Gillis, S., Daelemans, W., & Desmedt, K. (1995). Artificial intelligence. In J. O. Östman & J. Verschueren & J. Blommaert (Eds.), Handbook of Pragmatics: The Manual (pp. 61-80). Amsterdam: Benjamins.
  • Daelemans, W., Berck, P., & Gillis, S. (1995). Linguistics as data mining: The case of Dutch diminutives. In T. Andernach & M. Moll & A. Nijholt (Eds.), CLIN V (pp. 59-71). Twente: Parlevink.
  • Daelemans, W., Gillis, S., & Durieux, G. (1994). Skousen's analogical modeling algorithm. In J. C. Bioch & S. H. Nienhuys-Cheng (Eds.), 4th Belgian-Dutch Conference on Machine Learning (pp. 302-310). Rotterdam.
  • Daelemans, W., Gillis, S., & Durieux, G. (1994). The acquisition of stress: A data-oriented approach. Computational Linguistics, 20, 421-451.
  • Gillis, S., Daelemans, W., & Durieux, G. (1994). Are children Lazy Learners? A comparison of natural and machine learning of stress. In A. Ram & K. Eiselt (Eds.), Proceedings of the Sixteenth Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 369-374). Hillsdale: Erlbaum.
  • Daelemans, W., Gillis, S., & Durieux, G. (1994). Skousen's analogical modeling algorithm: A comparison with lazy learning. In D. Jones (Ed.), Proceedings of the International Conference on New Methods in Language Processing (NeMLaP) (pp. 1-7). Manchester.
  • Daelemans, W., Gillis, S., & Durieux, G. (1993). Machine learning of natural language: An empiricist alternative to nativist theory, Proceedings of Benelearn 1993. Brussel.
  • Daelemans, W., Gillis, S., Durieux, G., & Van den Bosch, A. (1993). Learnability and markedness in data-driven acquisition of stress (Vol. 43). Tilburg: KUB.
  • Daelemans, W., Gillis, S., Durieux, G., & Van den Bosch, A. (1993). Learnability and markedness in data-driven acquisition of stress. In M. Ellison & J. Scobbie (Eds.), Computational phonology (Vol. 8, pp. 157-178). Edinburgh: The University of Edinburgh.
  • Gillis, S., Daelemans, W., Durieux, G., & Van den Bosch, A. (1993). Learnability and markedness: Dutch stress assignment, Proceedings of 15th Conference of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 452-457). Hillsdale: Erlbaum.
  • Daelemans, W., Gillis, S., & Durieux, G. (1993). A data-driven approach to stress acquisition. In P. Adriaans (Ed.), European Machine Learning Conference, Workshop on Machine Learning Techniques and Text Analysis (pp. 15-24). Vienna.
  • Daelemans, W., Gillis, S., Durieux, G., & Van den Bosch, A. (1992). Exploring artificial learning algorithms: Learning to stress Dutch simplex words (= Antwerp Papers in Linguistics Vol. 71). Antwerp: University of Antwerp.

Dutch linguistics

  • Kloots, H., & Gillis, S. (2015). Waarom dromedarissen maar één m hebben. Dutch Journal of Applied Linguistics, 4(2), 265-271.

Variation in standard Dutch

  • Kloots, H., & Gillis, S. (2016). Vowel shortening in Flemish pronunciation guides (1860-2009). Beitrage zur Geschichte der Sprachwissenschaft, 26(1), 139-156.
  • Kloots, H., Gillis, S., & De Maeyer, S. (2014). Vowel pronunciation in open syllables in spontaneously spoken Standard Dutch: Exploring a phonological constraint in a listening task. Linguistics, 52(5), 1167-1194.
  • Kloots, H., & Gillis, S. (2012). Bang voor Babel: de verstaanbaarheid van tussentaal. In K. Absillis, J. Jaspers & S. Van Hoof (Eds.), De manke usurpator. Opstellen over Verkavelingsvlaams (pp. 225-244). Gent: Academia Press.
  • Kloots, H., Gillis, S., De Maeyer, S., & Verhoeven, J. (2012). De duur van de svarabhaktivocaal in het Standaardnederlands: een pioniersstudie. Tijdschrift voor Nederlandse Taal- en Letterkunde, 128(1), 2-19.
  • Kloots, H., & Gillis, S. (2011). Gespannen en ongespannen klinkers aan het syllabe-einde: Een overzicht van 25 jaar Antwerps onderzoek op het terrein. Verslagen & Mededelingen van de Koninklijke Academie voor Nederlandse Taal- en Letterkunde, 121(2), 129-154.
  • Kloots, H., Gillis, S., & Verhoeven, J. (2011). Van armen tot zwerk. Sjwa-insertie in het Standaardnederlands. Over Taal, 50, 34-36.
  • Kloots, H., Verhoeven, J., Coussé, E., & Gillis, S. (2010). De rol van vocaalduur bij de categorisatie van onbeklemtoonde Nederlandse klinkers. In J. De Caluwé & J. Van Keymeulen (Eds.), Voor Magda. Artikelen voor Magda Devos bij haar afscheid van de Universiteit Gent (pp. 347-361). Gent: Academia Press.
  • Kloots, H., Gillis, S., & Verhoeven, J. (2009). Merk toch hoe sterk: Sjwa-insertie in spontaan gesproken Standaardnederlands. Nederlandse Taalkunde, 14, 45-65.
  • Luyckx, K., Kloots, H., Coussé, E., & Gillis, S. (2007). Klankfrequenties in het Nederlands. In D. Sandra, R. Rymenans, P. Cuvelier & P. Van Petegem (Eds.), Tussen taal, spelling en onderwijs (pp. 141-154). Gent: Academia Press.
  • Coussé, E., Gillis, S., & Kloots, H. (2007). Verkort, verdoft, verdwenen: Vocaalreductie in het Corpus Gesproken Nederlands. Nederlandse Taalkunde, 12, 109-138.
  • Kloots, H., Gillis, S., & Swerts, M. (2006). Onbeklemtoonde vocalen aan het syllabe-einde in het Standaardnederlands van Vlamingen en Nederlanders. In T. Koole, J. Nortier & B. Tahitu (Eds.), Artikelen van de Vijfde Sociolinguïstische Conferentie (pp. 296-307). Delft: Eburon.
  • Kloots, H., Gillis, S., & Swerts, M. (2004). De uitspraak van het possessivum mijn in spontaan Standaardnederlands. In J. De Caluwe & G. De Schutter & M. Devos & J. Van Keymeulen (Eds.), Taeldeman, man van de taal, schatbewaarder van de taal (pp. 435-454). Gent: Academia Press.
  • Kloots, H., De Schutter, G., Gillis, S., & Swerts, M. (2004). Svarabhaktivokale im Standardniederländischen in Flandern und den Niederlanden. Zeitschrift für Dialektologie und Linguistik, 71, 129-155.
  • Swerts, M., Kloots, H., Gillis, S., & De Schutter, G. (2003). Vowel reduction in spontaneous spoken Dutch, Proceedings of the ISCA & IEEE Workshop on spontaneous speech processing and recognition (pp. 31-34). Tokyo, Japan.
  • Kloots, H., De Schutter, G., Gillis, S., & Swerts, M. (2003). Vocaalreductie in spontaan gesproken Standaardnederlands: Een verkennende studie. In T. Koole & J. Nortier & B. Tahitu (Eds.), Artikelen van de Vierde Sociolinguïstische Conferentie (pp. 224-233). Delft: Eburon.
  • Kloots, H., De Schutter, G., Gillis, S., & Swerts, M. (2003). Verdoffende vocalen en klinkers die verdwijnen: Een case-study. Nederlandse Taalkunde, 231-254.
  • Kloots, H., De Schutter, G., Gillis, S., & Swerts, M. (2003). Klinkervariatie in het Standaardnederlands: Mooment, momment, mement of 'ment. Neerlandia, 107, 30-31.
  • Kloots, H., De Schutter, G., Gillis, S., & Swerts, M. (2002). Sjwa-insertie in eindclusters: Variatiepatronen in het Standaardnederlands. Nederlandse Taalkunde, 7, 97-126.
  • Swerts, M., Kloots, H., Gillis, S., & De Schutter, G. (2001). Factors affecting schwa-insertion in final consonant clusters in Standard Dutch, Proceedings Eurospeech 2001 (pp. 75-78). Aalborg, Denmark: s.l.
Phonetic Transcriptions
  • Gillis, S., Depoorter, G., & Goddijn, S. (Manuscript never to be published). Phonetic Transcription. In T. b. announced (Ed.), The virtual handbook of the Spoken Dutch Corpus.
  • Kloots, H., Coussé, E., & Gillis, S. (2006). Vowel labelling in a pluricentric language: Flemish and Dutch labellers at work. In J. Van de Weijer & B. Los (Eds.), Linguistics in the Netherlands 2006 (pp. 126-136). Amsterdam: Benjamins.
  • Coussé, E., & Gillis, S. (2006). Regional bias in the broad phonetic transcriptions of the Spoken Dutch Corpus. In Proceedings of the 5th international conference on language resources and evaluation (pp. 2080-2083). Parijs: ELDA.
  • Coussé, E., Gillis, S., Kloots, H., & Swerts, M. (2004). The influence of the labeller's regional background on phonetic transcriptions: Implications for the evaluation of spoken language resources. In M. Lino & M. Xavier & F. Ferreira & R. Costa & R. Silva (Eds.), Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation (Vol. IV, pp. 1447-1450). Paris: ELRA.
  • Hoste, V., Daelemans, W., & Gillis, S. (2004). Using rule induction techniques to model pronunciation variation in Dutch. Computer Speech and Language, 18, 1-23.
  • Demuynck, K., Laureys, T., & Gillis, S. (2002). Automatic generation of phonetic transcriptions for large speech corpora. Proceedings of the International Conference on Spoken Language Processing, Vol. 1, 333-336.
  • Gillis, S. (2001). Protocol voor Brede Fonetische Transcriptie. Antwerp: University of Antwerp - UIA.
  • Hoste, V., Daelemans, W., & Gillis, S. (2000). A rule induction approach to modeling regional pronunciation variation, Proceedings of COLING 2000 (pp. 327-333). San Francisco: Morgan Kaufman Publishers.
  • Gillis, S. (2000). Fonemische proeftranscripties Vlaanderen. Antwerp: University of Antwerp - UIA.
  • Hoste, V., Gillis, S., & Daelemans, W. (2000). Machine learning for modeling Dutch pronunciation variation. In P. Monachesi (Ed.), Computational Linguistics in the Netherlands 1999. Selected Papers from the Tenth CLIN Meeting (pp. 73-83). Utrecht: UILOTS.
  • Hoste, V., Daelemans, W., Tjong Kim Sang, E., & Gillis, S. (2000). Meta-learning for phonemic annotation of corpora. In P. Langley (Ed.), Proceedings of ICML-2000 (pp. 375-382). Stanford: Stanford University.
Phonology
  • De Schutter, G., & Gillis, S. (2003). Klankstructuren van (een) taal: Nederlandse fonologie aan het begin van de eeuw. In G. De Schutter & S. Gillis (Eds.), Fonologische kruispunten (pp. 7-19). Gent: KANTL.
  • De Schutter, G., & Gillis, S. (Eds.). (2003). Fonologische kruispunten. Gent: KANTL.
Lexicon
  • De Schutter, G., & Gillis, S. (1990). Structurele aspecten van het Nederlandse lexicon (= Antwerp Papers in Linguistics Vol. 64). Antwerp: University of Antwerp.
  • Cuyckens, H., & Gillis, S. (1980). Semantic analysis of predicates expressing motion: The construction of an artificial language user (= Antwerp Papers in Linguistics Vol. 19). Antwerp: University of Antwerp.

Reviews

  • Gillis, S. (1991). Bespreking van 'Het Taallerend kind'. Leuvense Bijdragen, 80, 351-357.
  • Gillis, S. (1990). Review of ‘Early Lexical Acquisition’. Journal of Child Language, 17, 489-495.
  • Gillis, S. (1983). Bespreking van 'Nieuwe Streeflijst Woordenschat voor 6-jarigen'. Pedagogische Studiën, 60, 237-240.
  • Gillis, S. (1983). Review of E. Bates: 'The emergence of Symbols'. Journal of Pragmatics, 7, 141-143.
  • Van der Perre, C., & Gillis, S. (1982). Bespreking van 'Gedrag, dynamische relatie en betekeniswereld'. Pedagogisch Tijdschrift, 7, 141-143.

Miscelaneous

  • Gillis, S., Nuyts, J., & Taeldeman, J. (Eds.). (2000). Met taal om de tuin geleid. Antwerp: University of Antwerp.
  • Gillis, S., Nuyts, J., & Taeldeman, J. (2000). Georges De Schutter, de meester-tuinman van het Nederlands. In S. Gillis & J. Nuyts & J. Taeldeman (Eds.), Met taal om de tuin geleid (pp. 5-10). Antwerp: University of Antwerp.
  • Caron-Pargue, J., & Gillis, S. (1996). Verbal production and problem solving (= Antwerp Papers in Linguistics Vol. 85). Antwerp: University of Antwerp.
  • Gillis, S. (1989). What's the use of user models: Linguistic pragmatics and AI (= Antwerp Papers in Linguistics Vol. 61). Antwerp: University of Antwerp.
  • Gillis, S. (1981). Een artificieel intelligentiemodel voor semiotische extensie, Symposium IBM-NFWO 1981 (pp. 57-66). Brussel.
  • Gillis, S. (1981). Universele wetten en toevallig ware generalizeringen. Restant, 8, 131-138.
  • Gillis, S. (1980). Methodologische reflectie op de implementatie van een theorie. Computaal, 2, 5-19.